Check out our Top Rewards Cards to boost your points earning and travel more!
Editor’s note: BoardingArea is a distribution network of independent blogs, each with independent editorial. This post, as well as any post on any blog on BoardingArea, solely represents the views of that blog, and does not necessarily represent the views of BoardingArea or other blogs on the network. The following post solely represents the views of this blog, Rapid Travel Chai.
Hello to all the ‘this is travel, not politics’ readers of BoardingArea.
Usually you get your wish:
In 2016, I wrote Republicans Buy Gift Cards, Too. I referenced Rick Steves’ position that ‘travel is a political act’. BoardingArea blog Live and Let’s Fly shared Rick Steves’ 2024 endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for US president. The comments section has flown fast with cries about ‘sticking to travel’. The comments have many pro or con arguments that are not themselves travel-related. Let’s stick to travel here, then.
I have some experience of the US and the world to assert that travel is, indeed, a political act. Travel exists in societal and political settings, not a separate, imaginary escape.
I have lived in seven US states (Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, and Washington) and spent a decade abroad (mainland China, Hong Kong, and Japan). I have spent a large part of my adult non-work life in travel to every country in the world. I do not claim to be an ‘expert’. I am, though, a keen observer of the US and the world. Nowhere is travel separate from politics.
Powerful, Triangulating Cowardice
Few points travelers go without an Amazon Prime subscription. Many derive side or whole incomes from buying groups. Amazon is a major source of product for buying groups and gift card reselling.
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has as much ‘f-you’ money as anyone, anywhere. Yet, as the owner of the Washington Post (of which I am a paid subscriber), he showed extreme moral cowardice by last-minute spiking the paper’s planned editorial board 2024 endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for US president. His mealy-mouthed justification for the decision, without providing reasoning for the timing of it, can be read here. A joint letter by 21 Washington Post columnists in response to the decision is here, and many individual pieces as well as notable silence by some, can be seen scrolling the main opinion page.
Mr. Bezos put ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’ on the masthead. Now, he is trying a bit of hedging. He, and everyone in the country, know that one, and only one, US presidential candidate will, if elected, target, threaten, and harm specific individuals and businesses based on personal pique and vendetta. Every hedge and moral compromise advances this authoritarian playbook.
Many powerful people and institutions have failed the country with their own triangulation of potential personal gain. Everyday people must be the ones, at long last, to show moral courage. A broad, determined effort of civic-minded people can continue the American experiment.
Points Travelers Lap Up Public Largess
Other than the billionaire class, how many groups benefit, maximize, and optimize to gain as much from robust public and private institutions as points travelers? Yet as a group, our bouts of cognitive dissonance are strong.
Point travelers, regularly:
- Rail against big government yet run to the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) with even trivial complaints.
- Ditto for airline-related complaints to the Department of Transportation (DoT).
- Moan about excessive regulation but expect airlines and air traffic control to have impeccable safety records.
- Compliment hospitality workers to finagle upgrades and freebies, yet savage them for organizing for better working conditions and compensation.
Points libertarians are a vocal lot who profess to oppose government and regulation.
They rely on:
- Public communications networks for their online manufactured spend
- Public roads and other infrastructure for their in-person manufactured spend
- A common law legal system that allows them to oppose private financial institutions vastly more powerful than them
Quite a few ‘MS whales’ have public sector jobs that provide stability and work schedules that facilitate their manufactured spend.
They privately gloat about flexible work schedules, yet jump to tell others to work harder and be more self-reliant.
Points libertarians are for exactly the public services they use, and against what everybody else uses.
If You Can Tell that Delta SkyMiles is Untrustworthy
A large measure of the virulence of the 2024 US elections is that the presidential candidate of one of the two major political parties is devoted to a politics of hate and harm to others.
His supporters, often hesitant to openly cop to what they support, obscure it. They lash out with ‘bothsidesism’ and ‘whatab0utism’. Unconcealed, fantastical lies are commonplace.
Anyone who can decipher an airline award chart or a credit card rewards program is capable of quality information-seeking, recognizing and opposing disinformation and misinformation, and being civically engaged.
If you can identify that Delta SkyMiles is untrustworthy and tell people you shouldn’t put miles with them, then you can do the same for a political candidate.
The civic duty is not simply to vote. The civic duty is to be an informed voter and vote accordingly.
We should not give ourselves a pass that ‘it doesn’t matter who wins’ or ‘both parties are the same’ or excuse-making rationalizations for how we vote. We must recognize and take public responsibility for the consequences of our votes or non-votes.
Upset About Limited Flight Award Seats to Asia? Blame the Brokers, Right?
Brokers will not get any love on this blog. As long as there is demand for their services, they will exist.
Want more US-Asia premium cabin award seats? We need more trans-Pacific flights and morally justifiable overflights of Russia (which are huge cost savings to use polar routes). Here’s a two-point plan that addresses the systemic geopolitical causes of the award seat shortage:
- Total defeat of the Russian military, regime change and demilitarization of Russia, restoration of Ukraine’s full territorial integrity, so that Russia overflights resume.
- Major economic rebound and liberalization of China’s economy to have sufficient demand to China for airlines to economically restore something like 2019 flight levels (current demand is low, with more demand one-way China to US).
Do those two and you’ll see more ANA and JAL premium cabin award seats available to book.
I made this point in an award travel chat today in answer to a question about issues with trans-Pacific award availability. Saying brokers are the problem was not ‘political’. Stating the underlying geopolitical issues activating the brokers was rebuked as “…far outside the scope of this chat and award travel. Let’s keep it topical in here.” Yet, this is exactly why there are few award travel options US to Asia right now. Be part of the political process to solve those and you’ll see more award seats.
‘Stick to Travel’ Issues at Stake in the 2024 US Election:
Some ‘stick to travel’ issues at stake in the 2024 election:
- Existence of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- A Department of Transportation that works for safety in transportation and advocates for travelers
- Existence of the National Weather Service
- Air Traffic Control by qualified public servants
- United States Postal Service service reductions
- Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission/Department of Transportation review of corporate mergers and acquisitions to ensure customer benefit (e.g. Albertsons-Kroger combination, if it happens, may harm manufactured spend in a number of geographies)
- Disenfranchisement efforts targeting US citizens living abroad
- Disenfranchisement efforts targeting US military stationed abroad
- Tariffs that will harm the US economy, with knock-on effects to travel and to travelers with international business
- Diplomatic disputes that may impact visa-waiver and visa-issuance for international travel
- Liming or ending access to immunizations, with knock-on effects imposed by other countries on US travelers
- Rights and compensation for travel and hospitality industry workers
- Independent freedom of movement within the US for women and vulnerable groups
- Access to emergency healthcare when traveling within the US for women and vulnerable groups
- LGBTQ+ protections within the US
- Rights of naturalized US citizens
- Legal immigration
Endorsement: Points Travelers that ‘Stick to Travel’ Have One Clear Choice
One candidate for president, an un-adjudicated seditionist, openly threatens all these ‘stick to travel’ issues. Those who support him do not take him at his word. Those who oppose him take him at his word.
One candidate for president threatens none of these ‘stick to travel’ issues. From the perspective of points travelers, this candidate may improve some, ignore some, and worsen some. All this will be within Constitutional processes and with respect for the separation of powers among the co-equal branches of government:
- This candidate will be a normal president, as with 44 of 45 prior
- This candidate will make a genuine, sustained effort to be President to all Americans
- This candidate will not make capricious verbal attacks on individuals, companies, or institutions
- This candidate will not instigate or condone political violence
- Aspects of this candidate’s administration will be liked by many Americans
- Aspects of this candidate’s administration will be disliked by many Americans
- This candidate’s political party is not rubber-stamp ideologues; they will regularly and openly disagree with policy proposals
- There will be an election in 2028
Rapid Travel Chai endorses Vice President Kamala Harris for US President and Tim Walz for US Vice President in the 2024 election.
News Sources That I Pay to Read:
Robust news media is essential to civil society, as flawed as it is.
Here is a list of news and politics-related publications that I pay for subscriptions. I included a few that, budget-permitting, I am looking to subscribe.
Free sources are not listed.
Sources that I access via the library to not financially support (such as National Review), are not listed.
This is not an endorsement of the entirety of any publication. The base-level requirement is that the publication be intellectually honest in its editorial. The only exception to that is the Wall Street Journal. As intellectually dishonest as the editorial and opinion pages are, the rest of the paper is intellectually honest and among the highest-quality reporting found anywhere in English.
Note: substack publications I have included my refer-a-friend links that get bonus subscription months.
Special recognition:
The Bulwark is the leading publication of intellectually honest conservatives. I believe it is the best $80 you can spend in this election. Their focus groups, their podcasts, their videos, so much incredible dedication, patriotism, and defense of the Constitution.
Newspapers:
- Barron’s
- Financial Times (UK)
- Minneapolis Star-Tribune
- The New York Times (despite the continual, egregious headlines and framing of articles, see below, Breaking the News and American Crisis)
- Nikkei Asia (Japan)
- The Seattle Times
- The South China Morning Post (Hong Kong)
- The Wall Street Journal
- The Washington Post
Magazines:
- The Atlantic (especially the work of Anne Applebaum and David Frum)
- The Economist
- Harper’s
- New York (especially the work of Jonathan Chait)
- The New Yorker and companion The Political Scene Podcast (especially the work of Jane Mayer on money in politics)
- Seattle Magazine
- SeattleMet
- Texas Monthly
- Washingtonian
- Various educational and lifestyle magazines, not news-focused
Newsletters:
Newsletters that I am considering to subscribe, budget-allowing:
Check Out Our: Top Rewards Cards ¦ Newsletter ¦ Twitter ¦ Facebook ¦ Instagram
The final result of the election shows you were wrong. This article is
bs.
@Sarah – perhaps you are unclear on what a pre-election endorsement is? An election result does not make any endorsement right or wrong.
I haven’t even tried to read an “OpEd” in a major paper in the week since the election (will get there eventually) but I happened to stumble into this and read it carefully – twice.
Well done. REALLY well done.
Very thoughtful, thanks Stefan.
Couldn’t agree with you more, Stefan. Thanks for sharing.
Thank you. You make excellent points. I hope the orange man retires.
this post proves you are too stupid (and in a bubble) to ever read again. You are voting for censorship. How can you not see that?
Thank you for this 🙂
Thank you for writing this excellent post. It is well written, well reasoned and much needed. With so much at stake in this election, many Americans are stepping out of their lanes to encourage their followers to vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. You join Hollywood stars, sports celebrities, TikTok influencers and many, many other prominent and well known people in posting your endorsement. I hope those of your followers who haven’t yet worked through the true impact of a Trump/Vance/Project 2025 administration will read, thoughtfully consider and ultimately realize that it is a recipe for disaster, one that… Read more »
“Rapid Travel Chai endorses Vice President Kamala Harris for US President and Tim Walz for US Vice President in the 2024 election.” Bravo! Me too.
Can someone explain if this guys is affiliated with Boarding Area?
I need to decide to block his blog only, or the entire Boarding Area.
(it would be sad to lose Boarding Area, as I visit it 2-3 times a day)
That said…
I’m not interested in having any politics in my travel world.
Zero.
Especially one that promotes Censorship and War (as the democrats support)
Hard no.
It’s unclear if this is the owner of Boarding Area, or just an independent blogger who know one cares about.
I need to block one or the other.
Can someone clarify?
Since you are against censorship I wouldn’t censor either of them but that’s just my non-political opinion
Can’t tell whether this is disingenuous trolling or you literally didn’t bother to read even the first sentence.
Lol. As Michael Jordan said about being apolitical, Republicans and Democrats both buy sneakers.
Last time reading this blog. If I want to read political stuff, I’ll do that. Yes, Trump creates mean tweets. But he attacks people that specifically attacks him. Harris and her party have repeatedly called half the populace fascists, nazis and garbage.
I’ll take mean tweets and no new wars with low inflation any time.
You’re the only one here talking about tweets, mean or otherwise. Seems you’ve missed the point.
As always, well thought out and well written. Appreciate your insights.
Boo…you act as if anyone care what you think. I’m unsubscribing from this lame blog.
You should shut down your blog, and do something else.
Gutsy post. Surprised to see so many right wingers in the comments! See you in BKK soon.
Thanks for these thoughts and especially the links — a lot of interesting ‘stuff’ to engage with.
From a European perspective it’s fascinating to see that commenters have already started to label this post “leftwing crazy”. From here it doesn’t look to be either.
Absolutely disgusting to bring politics onto this board…and I would say that no matter what side you are on. We should have the ability to edit off certain bloggers from the Boarding Area feed. You would be the first to go.
You are wrong. Both parties are parties of hate. Harris supports punishing the rich using the lame excuse “pay their fair share” even thought they pay more than the average American in income tax. I support this hate. Sock it to rich people, including those with huge frequent flyer balances and write snobbish reviews of business class. Punish them and hate them. I support Harris and the party of hate, against Trump’s party of hate.
Punish the rich and those with many miles.
Wow. I appreciate the effort you put into this. Your assertions are rational and well considered. Hopefully your sensible points will resonate with readers since you’re clearly showing them how one candidate is in their personal interests.
Figures you’re not very good at taking criticism. True sign of a lefty. lol
Wow. I can get leftwing crazy rants on X anytime. But excellent job annoying half your potential audience and letting us know about your #TDS! Hopefully you got it out of your system? lol
Holy crapola. At first I thought you were clearly just trolling, but I actually think you may be serious. Your list of news sources explains everything. Especially your special citing of The Bulwark. Probably the premier leftwing propaganda rag of lies and disinfo out there. And if you think anyone isn’t clearly aware of whom the WaPo is endorsing by the fake news and lefty propaganda filling their “news” pages without even opening their Opinion pages, then you are as clueless as you sound. lol So if you are trolling, congrats, you got me! If you aren’t, I pray for… Read more »
Beautifully written piece. I am grateful for your reasoned AND valiantly passionate prose. May we live in a world where sociopathic cruelty no longer finds justification in anyone’s mind or heart.
Thank you. Everything you say about the hypocrisy of many of those who care about points is very true. I have noticed all of that even before reading this post. And if someone doesn’t have the courage to stand up against an insurrectionist who tried to overthrow an American election, I don’t want to have anything to do with them.